"In rhetoric, chiasmus (from the Greek: χιάζω, chiázō, "to shape like the letter Χ") is the figure of speech in which two or more clauses are related to each other through a reversal of structures in order to make a larger point; that is, the clauses display inverted parallelism. Chiasmus was particularly popular both in Greek and in Latin literature, where it was used to articulate balance or order within a text. As a popular example, many long and complex chiasmi have been found in Shakespeare and the Greek and Hebrew texts of the Bible.[1][2] It is also found throughout the Book of Mormon.[3] - Wikepedia
Wikipeda gives as an examle: "He blindly led and we blindly followed."
Another excellent example is this, from the Rockefeller Foundation at Davos: "We must avoid the unmanageable and manage the unavoidable."
You might try coining a chiasmus or two your own, if you are ever in a pinch for content while facing an imminent deadline. It will make you sound wise, balanced, and literate at little expense of logic or thought. Mostly people will have no idea what you are saying, and this a good thing when, as it happens, you are saying almost nothing. "Look who is talking," you might say, and you would be right. Even a good chiasmus will not cover my nakedness. And now I have probably blown my chance for that Rockefeller Peace and Justice grant.
Adding two sides to this chiasmus ... |X| ... nor can we avoid the unavoidable consequences of trying to manage the unmanageable.
Posted by: Geoff | January 29, 2013 at 09:25 PM
Why we are avoiding unmanageable, must try to manage.
Posted by: website developers new york | January 30, 2013 at 12:59 AM
Ask not what the unmanageable can do for you, ask what you can manage to do to the unmanageble.
Posted by: tom (@crowdedfalafel) | January 30, 2013 at 08:05 PM
Davos: The society of managers, the managers of society
Posted by: Phil Cubeta | February 01, 2013 at 09:15 AM
Aren't the attendees at Davos society ? The rest of us are just here-and-there to serve, no ?
Posted by: Jon Husband | February 01, 2013 at 03:06 PM
Yes, the higher ups are addressing each other at Davos about managing the unmangeable while avoiding the unavoidable. Going to the Alps does minimize contact with the unmanageables. The air clears the head. The altitude gives a sense of vision. Metrics are also helpful in avoiding skin to skin contact with the avoidables.
Posted by: phil | February 01, 2013 at 03:35 PM
Interesting thing about chiasmus and the Book of Mormon is that the presence of chiasmus is cited as proof that without an angel's dictation, a conniving con-man like J. Smith couldn't have written it, and is also cited as as proof that a conniving con-man like J. Smith must have plagiarized it from a Dartmouth Professor.
Posted by: usps | February 02, 2013 at 07:49 PM
Or proof that a Darmouth professor is a prophet?
Posted by: Phil Cubeta | February 06, 2013 at 11:28 AM