Once upon a time there was a lovely and well paid Enchantress, a marketer, skilled in the liberal arts, which she used for purposes of black magic. Acrasia was her name. She preyed profitably upon all who knew her by giving them whatever they wanted in accordance with the best principles of the Free Market System, which is actually the Right but Hidden Hand of God, according to her....More here with an interesting picture too.
Post a comment
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
As I've said before, the curation of pictures and words available on At The Crossroads belong in a Museum of Post-Modern Art.
Posted by: Jon Husband | April 18, 2010 at 05:41 PM
Jon, I appreciate the compliment. That way, too, I would have an alibi. Offensive and subversive? No, Sir, this is Art!
Posted by: Phil Cubeta | April 18, 2010 at 06:21 PM
Seems like alibis are the ordre de jour, non ?
Everyone's character is just fine, Goldman Sachs is doing God's work and Bill Clinto stating he was wrong about derivatives regulation is merely a fillip after having his way with the word "is".
It's all good.
Posted by: Jon Husband | April 18, 2010 at 06:35 PM
Whither the Ms. Is? Hither, thither and yon...
Posted by: jr | April 18, 2010 at 09:36 PM
Acrasia means knowing it is wrong and doing it anyway, beyond that is losing the capacity to know the difference or even to care.
Posted by: Phil Cubeta | April 19, 2010 at 11:07 AM
"beyond that is losing the capacity to know the difference or even to care."
The scale of the banality of the world banking community is rather daunting. Like lemmings, individually not much, but en masse, over the cliff, maybe something.
Posted by: tm | April 20, 2010 at 11:26 PM
As a salesman once said to me about the choice between selling product A with a high commission and produce B with a low commission, "The company must know that product A is better for the client otherwise they would not incentivize me to sell it."
Posted by: Phil Cubeta | April 21, 2010 at 08:49 AM
Such touching acts of faith float the Good Ship Enterprise.
Posted by: tm | April 21, 2010 at 11:55 PM
Assuming product B above is better for the client, who is responsible for the not quite appropriate recommendations made by the salesperson? Caveat Emptor, I guess.
Posted by: Phil Cubeta | April 22, 2010 at 08:30 AM
I was more wondering about the salesman's basic assumptions having to do with the nature of his company, his clients, and his relationship to both.
Posted by: tm | April 22, 2010 at 10:50 PM
His assumptions were that it was all bullshit and he would do the bullshit and take the money. He was a good God fearing man. He took me and my (then)small boy fishing with his own son. He has done well in the business. In business terms we were friends. I was his trainer. His remark was probably in response to some holier than thou suggestion I might have made about which product would be best for a client. Easy for me to say, since it was not my client, and my compensation did not depend on the sale. Best in business to glide over such matters. As one top salesman said to me, "Don't ask why there is air, just breathe."
Posted by: Phil Cubeta | April 22, 2010 at 11:29 PM