Mitch Nauffts interviews Matthew Bishop, New York Bureau chief of The Economist and co-author, Philanthrocapitalism: How the Rich Can Save the World. The gist seems to be that smart people have gone into business, more so in this century than in any other, hence world leadership rightly comes from the successful businessperson, that the super-rich will prosper in this dark time by buying out the less fortunate at rock bottom prices, and that plutocracy will get a bad name, and lead to social backlash, unless the super-rich are perceived to be public spirited. Philanthropy, then saves the world, or makes as if to do that, as a means to the end of legitimizing our current economic arrangements. Meanwhile, no pardon, apparently, from George Bush for noted philanthrocapitalist, and former Board Member at Hudson Institute, Lord Conrad Black. Bernie Madoff, philantrocapitalist extraordinaire, seems headed for prison too. Richard Fuld, a virtuous capitalist of the first order, has fallen into disgrace.
Efficiency, effectiveness, systems theories. wealth as a measure of success - unless the super-rich respond to moral and political traditions more inspiring than these, efforts at self-legitimization through strategic philanthropy may come up short, even if Bill Clinton is front and center and even if Matthew Bishop, trotting before his master's carriage, blows the herald's trumpet until his cheeks burst. Legitimacy in a democracy is built from the botton up. We the people. So, maybe, social change philanthropy might garner a modest world-saving investment?
...hence world leadership rightly comes from the successful businessperson,...
[hollow, mirthless laugh]
Sounds like one of these people who think the end and paramount purpose of intellectual activity is to get oneself into a good, snug, defensible position. Comforting the comfortable is a good method, but it has an enervating effect on the morals. Luckily for the sufferer, he is not aware that he has been afflicted. The afflicted are the less fortunate, who bring up things like "justice" which just embarrasses everybody.
Posted by: kia | December 28, 2008 at 04:47 PM
Oops I don't know what happened to the beginning of that last sentence.
Posted by: kia | December 28, 2008 at 04:49 PM
Thought was happening, Kia, and what a pleasure it is to see it here. If Matthew Bishop were interviewing for the role of Butler in a family I served as Morals Tutor, I would tell him to stand up straighter, lower his nose to be level with the floor, and not to smirk. As Matthew is our distinguished guest, however, I remain silent as he butters up my boss. Later in the kitchen, I suppose, he will join me and the other servants and have a high old time toasting our superiors and wishing them and their children long and happy lives. A tip at Christmass? Not this year; things are tough. Lay on the flattery as much as we might, not a dime.
Posted by: Phil Cubeta | December 28, 2008 at 06:14 PM