Porto-Freedom-Potties are a 10 Bottom Line Social Venture. Count 'em on your fingers: 10 ways to win!
- When citizens protesting the loss of civil liberties are ushered into the designated Ordered Liberty Free Speech Pens, they will have the option of purchasing a Porto-Freedom-Potty that straps conveniently to the left thigh. As such the Porto-Potty provides much needed consumer relief. Win #1.
- The Porto-Freedom Potty makes a big profit, since the consumers are captive. Through the miracle of the pricing mechanism, equating supply and demand, profits are huge. Win #2.
- Porto-Freedom Potties operate on a sweetheart government contract, helping privatize functions that would otherwise require taxes. Win # 3.
- Porto-Freedom-Potties exercises its own right to free speech by making large campaign contributions to the political powers that be. Free speech is good. Win #4.
- Porto-Freedom Potties employs the legislators who made the sweetheart deals when they are out of office. Big savings on unemployment insurance for small businesses, the backbone of America. Win #5.
- Porto-Freedom-Potties are made by prison labor right here in the USA. Wins #6, #7, # 8 and #9. (Forprofit prisons, job skills for inmates from disadvantaged background, more campaign contributions, enhanced support for law and order.)
- Embedded in each Porto-Potty purchase is a $5 dollar donation to American Enterprise Institute. Win # 10 is philanthropy.
After sextuple, who's counting? Most people like to smoke.
Posted by: Cackety Dishwitz | December 17, 2007 at 02:55 PM
Count 'em on your fingers: 10 ways to win!
Ideal for the diametrical phalangopist!
Posted by: Antoine Möeller | December 17, 2007 at 06:22 PM
#11: Environmental bottom line: Helps reduce your carbon footprint by reducing the total number of flushes.
#12: Existential bottom line: With the Porto-Freedom Potty strapped to your leg, you're never quite sure if you're coming or going.
#13: Feminist bottom line: Women are empowered to piss standing up.
Posted by: Stuart | December 17, 2007 at 09:54 PM
Gross.
Posted by: Albert | December 17, 2007 at 09:55 PM
The whole problem could be solved by auctioning protest vouchers to the highest bidder.
Posted by: Phil | December 18, 2007 at 10:10 AM
A marvelous idea, Phil. If you could rid your blog of this comment pestilence we might get something done.
To riff and raff I say:
No Christian Lady has ever peed standing up. All stand up pee comes from heathens. Having a bottle to catch it or not it is still heathen pee.
One sees the imprint of ample buttocks throughout the soft soil of Christian History - the event has been fossilized even.
Should you "historians" ever come to your senses sufficiently you might actually approach a Real Christian Lady - see if she hasn't found numerous avenues to Democratic Expression superior to crude protest. So that you need not darken any Good Christian Doors I shall assure you here: She has.
A Real Christian Lady would never strap anything to her thigh that she couldn't pull the trigger of. You may count on it.
Posted by: Mrs. Frist Do No Harm | December 18, 2007 at 01:30 PM
I wonder if the indignation has the right target. Beyond language, family values, and religious belief, things that may divide us, we should be united in defense of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. While we the people pick fights with one another, we are all getting swindled from those above us.
Posted by: Phil | December 18, 2007 at 07:04 PM
Perhaps I have been too harsh, Phil. When one's core values are under constant seige one tends to lash out at one's persecutors. I will try to practice some good Christian Charity in support of your noble experiment.
Who knows, perhaps one day riff, raff and I will be manning the ramparts together. Stranger things have happened.
Posted by: Mrs. Frist Do No Harm | December 18, 2007 at 07:39 PM
Exactly. All but a few lose in the direction in which we are headed. To reverse that we the people have to find common cause. We the people include Mormons, Jews, Christians, Secular Humanists, homos and homophobes, male, female. Christian women offended by bad language are not the enemy per se, though they are easy dupes.
Posted by: Phil | December 18, 2007 at 09:00 PM
Could someone with a little pull help to straighten this out? Seems the Mormons, Jews, Christians, Secular Humanists, homos and homophobes, males, females (even the squatting Christian type) are reasonably united about this:
The FCC Ignores the Public Will
and this
From the look of things, most Americans would welcome the rule of law and an end to extremes of brutality
and some other stuff, too, I think.
I figure there's something at the bottom of it all. We should try to find it out.
Posted by: Antoine Möeller | December 19, 2007 at 01:29 PM
You are operating on the illusion that corporations "represent" the electorate. Corporations represent stockholders. They hire lobbyists and make campaign contributions to their officials in DC. The rest is campaign rhetoric based on talking points produced by think tanks funded by Conrad Black et al. United against the game does not do us much good, unless, I guess, we raise enough money to buy our politicians back.
Posted by: Phil | December 19, 2007 at 09:34 PM
Speaking of stuff that doesn't get reported. Would something like this go unreported and uninvestigated if it involved a company with connections to Democratic Party leaders?
Posted by: Gerry | December 20, 2007 at 07:22 AM
Friends in high places for KBR. We may not like it in the relocation centers they run when our time comes.
Posted by: Phil | December 20, 2007 at 08:53 AM
i believe in the public trust. do not ruin it for me.
Posted by: archy | December 20, 2007 at 11:43 AM
Boy, at the very least this raises mouth-dropping questions, thanks to you.
Posted by: Dian Sauer | December 20, 2007 at 11:44 AM
you see? ms. sauer's on it. stop griping.
Posted by: archy | December 20, 2007 at 11:46 AM
You are operating on the illusion that ... negative ... depressing ... boring ... raise enough money to buy our politicians back.
Hey, we all save $2500 a year thanks to Walmart, no one disputes that. If we each take just half of that and put it in a big pile we could afford something, right??
Let's spread a little "extreme philanthropy" on the grassroots and see who salutes it. Like archy says, it beats griping by a long shot!
Posted by: Antoine Möeller | December 20, 2007 at 12:11 PM
Well, that is one problem fixed. What is next?
Posted by: phil | December 20, 2007 at 01:00 PM
You are operating on the illusion that ... negative ... depressing ... boring ... raise enough money to buy our politicians back.
Hey, we all save $2500 a year thanks to Walmart, no one disputes that. If we each take just half of that and put it in a big pile we could afford something, right??
Let's spread a little "extreme philanthropy" on the grassroots and see who salutes it. Like archy says, it beats griping by a long shot!
Posted by: Antoine Möeller | December 20, 2007 at 01:49 PM
Change.org actually supports that kind of grassroots fundraising for lobbying, I believe.
Posted by: phil | December 20, 2007 at 02:40 PM
i believe you believe he she they believe.
Posted by: archy | December 20, 2007 at 05:12 PM
we believe. we are believers.
Posted by: archy | December 20, 2007 at 05:13 PM
conjungate that saleem.
Posted by: archy | December 20, 2007 at 05:14 PM
Archy, no Thunderbird until after you blog or comment.
Posted by: Phil | December 20, 2007 at 10:58 PM
mad dog bad dog. woof!
Posted by: archy | December 20, 2007 at 11:49 PM
Merry Christmas, you beautiful losers, and Good Luck - I believe we all may need it.
Posted by: O Lucky Man | December 21, 2007 at 10:23 PM
Agreed. Happy Holidays all around. The War on Christmas - let us fight on!
Posted by: Phil | December 22, 2007 at 10:28 AM