The fear of democratic leaders that their party might be further accused of being soft on terrorism apparently prompted them to vote for the new FISA legislation -- handing new unilateral surveillance powers to the executive branch while significantly diminishing judicial oversight. Civil liberties groups and lawmakers opposed to the legislation believe the changes will make it easier for the government to spy on U.S. citizens, because the more loosely defined FISA statute now allows warrantless surveillance of people communicating with others who are "reasonably believed to be outside the United States." During the House debate last Saturday night, Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., described the bill as an enormous loophole that will grant the attorney general the ability to "wiretap anybody, any place, any time without court review, without any checks and balances."
Confidentiality isn't what it once was. I hope some day to rise in the world and get access to my opponents' most private communications. That way I can keep America safe. You can trust me. I have your best interests at heart.
I got stuck in a loop watching a butt-spritzing commercial. Here's an unencumbered version.
Posted by: bUM fREE | August 12, 2007 at 05:39 PM
I am he as you are he as you are me and we are all together
I thought you gifty guys liked this boundary breaking kinda stuff. What's wrong, losing your nerve?
Posted by: O Lucky Man | August 12, 2007 at 06:00 PM
Well, now that Gordon Liddy has been rehabilitated maybe they can put him in charge, or Chuck Colson.
Posted by: Phil | August 12, 2007 at 06:58 PM
I miss Uncle Admiral. And Auntie Social.
Posted by: Tater Tot | August 12, 2007 at 07:34 PM
Anonymity will be strictly symbolic when the War on Terror is fully deployed. Freedom of assembly, maybe, but be careful to observe company protocol.
Posted by: Phil | August 12, 2007 at 08:49 PM