« Theory of the Leisure Class- Reflections on Class in America | Main | Framing Philanthropy - Think Tank Thespians »

July 08, 2007


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

O Lucky Man

This might help:

Standing up an opponent

The Strategy: Try to catch your opponent off guard or by surprise with the uppercut, do not probe with it! Uppercuts are usually thrown following jabs or hooks from close range. Uppercuts to the chin stand up an opponent giving you a target: the HEAD.

BTW, home ownership recently hit at an all-time high, 69% I believe. Seems like something is working...


foreclosures are up to, and reposessions.

JJ Commoner

Best of luck ... "they" carry brass knuckles in their wallets, for when they really need to use them and concepts and words won't carry the day.

Re: home ownership ... how many recent (last 3 or 4 years) additions to home ownership used their credit cards for the downpayment or took on 100% mortgages with interest-only payments ? It would be interesting to find that statistic.

O Lucky Man

As the Famous American Patriot quipped:

Equality of Opportunity, Not Results

Take this article for instance. You have an equal opportunity to read the first paragraph. Whether that results in you reading the entire article depends on your individual initiative.



I like pictures. You know, they're worth a lot of words.

Look at this one. You have to admit Mr. Schambra cuts a dashing figure. Heroic even. Like the prow of a ship. Or it's rudder, keel, bulkhead... something wet and heroic, maritime!

How about this one. What is it, I can't quite tell. A lion lecturing dogs? It's too small, I can't tell. Make it bigger, Mr. Hudson!

Or this one. Very cool. There's a lot of attention being focused here, that's for sure. Only Art could capture that! Draw more things!

p.s. You can tell this is a Philanthropy Blog because of all the giving (plus it says so at the top.) Count the links to Mr. Hudson's site, then count the links returning: Altruism!

p.p.s That's what they call it in The Biz. Outside they call it something else, a lot more impolite. No need for that. Civility! Another Biz word! Yay!

p.p.p.s. Hey, it just occurred to me that *I* am getting more giving - probably just being on this blog helps a lot. Like, me saying Mr. Schambra's name: Schambra. That was like giving to him on the web. Shambra Shambra Shambra! My cup overfloweth! His does too! Everybody wins! This stuff is catching on!

JJ Commoner

"Schambra" will get you links and googlejuice, maybe.

"Shambra Shambra Shambra" will get you a recruiting visit from the local Hare Krishna battalion.

Sherwod Schwartz

"Schambra Schambra Schambra" is an infringement of my intellectual property.


The logo image, I think, is the mother lion lecturing her whelps on how to hunt down their prey and devour it. Predators with Family Values.

I like Bill and enjoy his writing. He is having his own one way conversation at a higher level. He delivers hellacious shots against the passive aggressive, polite, liberal foundations and is basically ignored for his trouble. He is "out of bounds," his remarks are "uncalled for," he is a ruffian. What he is really is a very fine teacher of political science, and practical politics. He has made sophistry into an art. At some level, he is truly laughing at how easy it is to confuse and wrong foot his opponents. Liberalism has been in the ascendency for so long it has lost the ability to articulate its own defense.

He doesn't respond to me because he realizes that he would be entering a frame in which he cannot win. Satire has always been the answer to sanctimonious hypocrisy. Shambra et al draw on the Victorian Social Darwinists and their priggish moralists. I draw on Dickens. Guess who won that battle last time around?

It is not that I do it well, but that in reawakening satire, we have discovered the predator's predator. Those little lion cubs under that tree are asking Bill, "What do we do if The Happy Tutor shows up, Poppa, and whups us?" And Poppa says, "I am taking that under advisement. Be back to you shortly."

This is all in fun. Bill can't get good fights, I can't either. We are two bums sparring by the Dumpster, reminding ourselves of better days, long gone, when we were actually considered promising intellects.

Now he works for a think tank, and I work for a Social Venture Philanthropist who made her billions on her back. Of the two of us he has done more with his native gifts, and compromised himself less. All I can claim is that I have done less damage to country.


Blogged the Panel pic. Good theater. "To delight and instruct," as Horace says the artist must.


Liberalism has been in the ascendency for so long it has lost the ability to articulate its own defense.

Hmmm, I find this suspect on a number of levels. First, it pre-supposes that what Bill et al are battling with is actually a liberal position, and I suspect that it is "in name only", in much the way that Bill is conservative in name only, as a cover for something that is radically reactionary.

Your adjunct link on another post is suggestive. Shambra's adjunct is twisting it all about, but the author he critiques is trying to point out the lack of a social conscience in mainstream/liberal foundations. Is it surprising that the elites defang any effective movement for social justice? Is it surprising that they cannot defend themselves is a fight they are not committed to?

Stuart Johnson

All you promising intellects are free to take your best shots at Bill this coming Wednesday on Sean's blog. Sean promises that Bill will be available to respond to questions.

I'll bring my pocket Webster's so's I can keep up.


Nuetrality, objectivity, fair play, openeness to positions other than your, a quite educated civil prose, good manners, good taste - these form a tradition. To those in the tradition is sometmes seem just a matter of what we all do, all must do, what civilized people have always done. Against that come the Vandals and Goths sacking civilization - Coulter, Limbaugh, the Creationists, the hard right think tanks, ideologues all. Yet what Schambra and Schwartz point out is that this tradition is not self-evident. Its manners and mores and protocols embody a viewpoint or ideology and finesse virulent opposition by consigning it historically to the margins. Now the positions are reversed, the loud overtly ideological team is in power and they abusing the old guard of the liberal establishment, mocking them. And to date I don't hear much of a response from Ford, Pew, Russell Sage, Rockefeller. Shunning no longer works. So how are we to deal with the scornful insurgents who are now in charge of so much of our polity? How do we defend our viewpoint, without falling into the trap of earnestly debating with a trickster rhetor? How do we resond "politely" to greivious bullying insult? I suggest that the history of the English language shows us better models than any seen recently from the mainstream foundations. Moral Tutor to the Evangelical Right? Moral Tutor to Bill Bennett? Why not? Somewhere between Christ and now we had an Englightenment, and with it Neoclassicism, and Social Contract Theory, and satire as well.

Phil Anthropoid

Don't expect much from the liberal foundation. It lives in terror of regulation, and nothing attracts more attention in Byzantium than a skirmish with the Goths at the city gates.

How do we respond? I plan to don a penis gourd and recite some lines from Juvenal. What else is there for me to do?

I know more about the ghoulish beliefs of the wingnuts Schambra places on his panels than I know about his own beliefs. What kind of man is he? After he's eaten a child for breakfast and is sated, what kind of drunken nonsense does he sputter? What kind of conservative is he? Is he motivated primarily by his antipathy to free love? gay people? immigrants? Catholics? Is it all about the misuse of his tax dollars?


I think he has a secret vice: in private he is a pointy headed secular relativist! I am just guessing. But I can sense it in his eyes.


Can a liberal foundation give discreetly to a donor advised fund at say Tides for re-granting to organizations less mainstream? I can't believe that you are forced to be mainstream in funding. There must be other influences at play. The role of the foundation board?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)


Wealth Bondage Premium Content

  • Castle by the Sea
    Provided as a professional courtesy at no extra charge to those with net worth of $25 million or more and/or family income of $500,000 a year or more, and to their Serving Professionals of all genders.