You Call this a "Meritocracy," George?
Of course we in America do have an upper class or Aristocracy, and it is Yale or Harvard educated, and largely incompetent, such is the tenor of this fine, indignant piece at Firedoglake.
Of course we in America do have an upper class or Aristocracy, and it is Yale or Harvard educated, and largely incompetent, such is the tenor of this fine, indignant piece at Firedoglake.
What the mainstream is truly missing here en masse is that another tsunami is building right behind the finance fiasco, and that it will render moot the whole reeking cargo of schemes and wishes that comprises the Great Bail-out. I am speaking of the global oil problem. In fact, the problems in banking and money currently roaring in the center ring of the world circus, can be described categorically as a product of the oil problem -- since oil is the primary resource of industrial economies and therefore the motive force behind our ability to generate "wealth." Without reliable and ever-growing supplies of oil, there is no industrial growth, and without industrial growth things like capital investment instruments lose their legitimacy. That is why the Frankenstein family of Ponzi securities was invented in the first place -- to compensate for the demise of industrial growth by creating wealth out of... nothing!
Would higher taxes, more robust civic infrastructure, and a lovely physical and cultural environment make us happier than we are now in the increasingly dilapidated paradise of capitalism? Surely not! Happiness is a choice. Or a prescription. Soon it will be a life sentence without parole.
Question for You: I take this essay in Private Wealth Magazine as suggesting that the big money investors have been getting 25% returns from buying out Main Street businesses? And, given the disproportionate returns, more money from hedge funds, pension funds, family offices, and wealthy private investors is now flowing into these private equity funds? Is this another example of a community being drained for the benefit of the forces of homogenization and centralization?
More Questions: As boomer business owners age, will they sell out to Wall Street? And will we see fewer locally owned and operated businesses on Main Street? What influence will absentee owners have or fail to have on the quality of life in a community? For those in the life insurance business who use insurance to make a market for otherwise illiquid business interests at death, does the rise of private equity reduce the need for life insurance produts for business continuation and transfer?
Reflections of a grad student in literature who has a place at Wall Mart. He learns in his orientation that the company he had thought of as exploitative is actually philanthropic and socially responsible. In a year or so he may get health insurance. Meanwhile, Customer Satisfaction is his purpose in life. Reminds me of my days early as an entry level Customer Satisfaction Specialist III in Wealth Bondage. Thank God, I got promoted into the Philanthropy Division.
Speaking of politics, here from Mascots Unlimited are some really nice hood ornaments from the British Royal Family's car collection.
Mr. Matrullo reflects on Reinhold Niebuhr. To see the mote in another's eye, but not the beam in your own is an ethical failing. For that matter so is being blind to the murders traditionally committed by those in your station in life. What is going on? Best not to see or say, lest you be the one to whom bad things happen in secret with nothing said and no appeal. How well Americans will adapt themselves to these blindnesses and insights remains to be seen. So far we are doing very well, I think, at least in the not seeing what is going on area of our social obligations. Philanthropy helps too in that regard being so polite and inoffensive. Leadership in selective attention is provided by our media. Who can blame us for not seeing what is really going on?
Katie Couric, (quoted on MediaCitizen) reflecting on McClellan's charge that the media were complicit with the war propaganda that he promulagated:
"I think it's one of the most embarrassing chapters in American journalism," she said. "And I think there was a sense of pressure from corporations who own where we work and from the government itself to really squash any kind of dissent or any kind of questioning of it. I think it was extremely subtle but very, very effective."
Ah, so will Katie now interview her owners on camera and ask them the hard questions? "Knock, knock, Sir? Excuse me. Can I bring the camera crew in now, Sir?"
Maxed Out is an excellent 120 minute online video documenting America's addiction to debt and who profits from it. To me this sad story connects to philanthroy in the form of a personal moral dilemma. Those who profit most systematically from pushing subprime debt, credits cards to college students, and even payday loans and pawn shops are the same big banks whose names are a whose who of philanthropic services providers (and campaign contributors). Many of my closest colleauges and thought leaders in philanthropy draw their paychecks from the banks some of whose divisions operate like loan sharks. Does this mean that if I give a talk on philanthropy for some nonprofit and the sponsor is a big bank that I should refuse to drink the Perrier they paid for or eat the brie? Something, or many things, are so wrong in this country that one looks in vain for a place to begin. As some say, "There is no 'outside' of Wealth Bondage." Even Gifthub is sponsored by them. I mean I got to make a living somehow.
Here is a thought: If you are getting your advice on philanthropy from a Trusted Advisor inside Wealth Bondage, consider asking a more independent source, if you can find one. Remember, for a philanthropic operation to prosper inside a Fortune 100 bank its return on capital must compete with the credit card operation. How? Well, that is what a SVP would need to explain to stay on top of that particular philanthropic heap. If he or she can't make that kind of money off keeping your money invested in some account, philanthropic or otherwise, they will find someone who will. I only wish they would call me with a job like that. I could double my salary and do good at the same time.
You see how this works? If you do have philanthropic capital, take care where you put the principal and where you get your advice. We can do better, but I am increasingly convinced it has to start with the donor/client/social investor. The rest of us are just going to batten off your money, and go where you go. Please consider providing some leadership. Write me if you want to talk about real social change.
I am reading Understanding Philanthropy, Its Meaning and Mission, by Robert L. Payton and Michael P. Moody. In it I came upon the most remarkable quotation from the Protestant theologian, Rheinhold Niebuhr, who wrote that the first ethical question is, "What is going on?"

Phil Cubeta, Morals Tutor to America's Wealthiest Families
Recent Comments